Sunday, 14 August 2022

Summer of 2022 in the UK

 Although the sun has been out and the sky has been blue for an unusually great amount of time in the UK this year, this is not to suggest that all is well (by British standards anyway). Humdrum tasks and day-to-day life are being undermined for virtually everyone (to varying extents) due to several issues. Strikes, not a prominent feature of British life for decades, have been unusually frequent and widespread this summer; access to water is increasingly being restricted; and the fairly obscure idea of "inflation" is manifesting itself in increased prices for various essentials. For most, these are inconveniences (fortunately, that is the case with me so far); for others, they are having a greater impact.

The strikes very much seem to be linked to the issue of inflation, as various trade unions (most noticeably, the railway unions) demand hefty pay increases in response to inflation. From speaking to people, there seems to be quite a lot of sympathy for them- not from me though. My view is that they are drawing the public into an issue, and punishing them, for something that isn't their fault. From my perspective, it is like the unions are squaring up to their bosses, as the public look on... then the public walk away with a black eye. This seems fundamentally wrong to me. When it comes to pay increases, I, like most British people, don't have a trade union to fight my corner for me- let alone have the ability to blackmail anyone with the threat of strikes. If I'm not happy with my working conditions or salary, I have to fight for myself- or look for another job. And, right now, with unemployment low and demand for workers high, employees are in a position of strength- without needing to strike and sabotage the daily lives of the public in the process. It's quite startling that part of unions' strategy is to calculate the most damage they can do to get their way; e.g., noting that many workers can now work from home, railway unions have shifted their strategy from strikes on weekdays only, to straddling weekdays and weekends, to harm a greater cross-section of people... What a terrible outlook to have! These workers aren't the only ones in the country unhappy with their wages; and, as a result of their actions, they do serious damage to people who rely on rail services. Included in this category are those businesses still recovering from the disruption of covid over recent years; it's almost as if the unions are privately thinking "the more businesses that fail because of us, the more likely we are to get our own way"... I think it's perfectly fine to make your case for higher wages- just leave the public out of it! In fact, I think it could be fairer all round if strikes were abolished and, in scenarios when unions would  hitherto call a strike, they instead summon their employers to court, each side makes their case, and a court decides who is most in the right and compels according action. Fortunately, the government (despite the awkward limbo it is currently in, as the country is now effectively between prime ministers) seems to be taking steps to prevent such situations from having the same impact in the future. We will see how this pans out...

As mentioned at the beginning of this article, our unusually hot weather in the UK has led to water shortages- and this is expected to be a more regular occurrence in the future. From what I've seen, the long-term plan to deal with this so far is to muddle through, and water companies hinting that the usage of hosepipes being restricted could be an annual feature of British summers. Rather than placing the onus on the British public, to restrict their water usage (while paying the same water bills), I get the impression that there are fairer and more effective measures that could be taken now, and in the future: water companies are notorious for wasting large amounts of water through leaks- this should fundamentally be addressed instead of wagging fingers at the public about their water usage; the UK is being unevenly affected by this- therefore, those parts of the country with larger water supplies could share with those in greater need during the most difficult times; more reservoirs could be built so that we are better prepared and self-sufficient for when the dry periods arrive; then, of course, there is that aid to many of the UK's issues: reducing demand by limiting immigration further.

Finally, there is inflation. This has been triggered by numerous factors largely out of the UK's control, namely the coronavirus and its repercussions, then combined with the war in Ukraine. This has been a key point in the debate between the candidates to be the next British Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss (it has also been the key differentiator between them). While Truss advocates tax cuts to allow more of the British to keep more of their earnings to cope with increased costs, Sunak advocates sticking with high taxes to deal with the British national debt. On the face of it (and as Sunak has repeatedly said), Truss' approach of scrapping taxes would increase the amount of money sloshing around the UK, thereby making inflation even worse; on the other hand, high taxes and high cost of living will ultimately lead to the public spending less, and thus would hopefully slow inflation. At the same time, as Sunak highlights, the higher taxes can be used to reduce our national debt; the interest accumulated as a result of this debt being one of the largest government expenses- and sees ever-growing chucks of taxpayers' money being passed on to those we have borrowed money from. 

Inflation seems to be the worst issue of the above, as I have faith that the problems of strikes and water shortages will pass (for now at least) in the very near future. However, rather than sweeping these issues under the rug until next time, they should be addressed. I hope the next Prime Minister, and those responsible for Britain's current issues, will adopt the philosophy of fixing the roof when the sun is shining (or, in the case of water shortages, make the most of the rain before the sun shines too much again next time!).

Sunday, 31 July 2022

Evaluation of Boris Johnson

 With Boris Johnson's time as UK Prime Minister due to end in the very near future, I wanted to share my thoughts on his tenure. Although the manner of the end of his term of office isn't a positive one, it's difficult to think of a time when a Prime Minister's term DID have a happy ending for the Prime Minister concerned. Whilst much emphasis has been placed on his apparent lack of honesty and inappropriate conduct; perhaps controversially, whilst I of course believe that Prime Ministers should behave appropriately, I personally didn't want him to resign, as it's my view that a Prime Minister should only step down if they have made mistakes in terms of policies/laws they have passed or decisions directly impacting the country. The two main motivations behind his resignation were, firstly, attendance of "parties" during the Covid lockdowns; and, secondly, for allowing a politician to remain in office despite being found to have behaved inappropriately. Whilst both acts deserve scrutiny and criticism, neither involve the direction of the country in my opinion, which are primarily what we should be concerned with with regards to our Prime Ministers. The impression I get is that his fundamental decisions as leader, and policies pursued (which are the most important aspects of a Prime Minister to me), were relatively popular, and I'm not convinced that most of the public have turned against his policies. 

My wish is therefore that Boris Johnson's successor hopefully maintains the same approach to flagship policies such as "Levelling Up", continues working on Brexit to make it as practical and beneficial to the UK as possible, and attempting to address issues with illegal migration via the English Channel. Based on my understanding (which has, admittedly, been learnt rather than directly seen or experienced), there have been clear disparities in wealth and opportunities across the UK for decades (perhaps the worst legacy of Margaret Thatcher's premiership, which I generally otherwise speak highly of) and "Levelling Up" not only expressed intent to address this, but also showed how this could actually be achieved: by encouraging investment and improving infrastructure. 

Given that Boris Johnson's policies do not appear to have been rejected by the public, I hope that his flagship policies are maintained until at least the next general election (and, potentially, reaffirmed in that election as well). As regards Boris Johnson personally, I feel that he generally got the balance right between seriously governing the country, and also sharing his trademark sense of humour. It is disappointing that he did behave inappropriately though, in a way that led to his downfall.

 Nevertheless, with those policies of his that can (and should) be maintained for the foreseeable future, and looking back on his actual handling of the coronavirus, Brexit, and the economy, he seems to me to have done a good (and difficult!) job. It is easy to criticise him (and many have extensively carried out this easy exercise), but I'm pleased that he has remained his positive, bullish self, and trumpeted his achievements in a way that is justifiable- and necessary, to try and counter the potentially overwhelming tidal wave of criticism he experiences from much of the establishment.

Sunday, 6 February 2022

Vote for World Peace?

 At present, it feels like there is quite a lot of underlying tension in the world, often resulting from long-running territorial disputes. A few examples of this that spring to mind include recognition of Taiwanese independence, and the status of both Crimea and Kashmir. Apologies if this makes these issues too simplistic, but I feel like, if a referendum that was agreed by all sides to be free and fair was held, could this result then be used to draw a line under these issues and allow the world to move on? An example of this could be the Falkland Islands: ownership of the islands has been disputed for hundreds of years now between Great Britain and Argentina. However, a 2013 referendum on whether the Islands would remain a British Overseas territory (voted on by the people who lived there) resulted in over 99% of people voting to preserve the status quo. Regardless of the past, what should be top priority in territorial disputes is the will of the people who live there, here and now; and, in the Falkland Islands, they overwhelmingly rejected becoming an Argentine territory; a result which can, and should, be respected and accepted by all, as stated by the people living there and most affected by the issue.

Although referenda often don't have as decisive a result as the one in the Falkland Islands, it gives an example nevertheless. I would therefore like to think that similar votes could be held in Taiwan (on unification with the People's Republic of China; or continued independence); Crimea (on whether it forms part of Russia or Ukraine); or Kashmir (on whether it forms part of India of Pakistan) to draw a line under these issues that undermine global instability and international relations. Such votes could be overseen by all sides, including objective external powers, that could be agreed by all concerned parties, and the referendum results would hopefully allow peaceful progress to be made around the globe with issues that have hitherto threatened conflict and complicated global relationships.

Sunday, 2 January 2022

Royal Round-up: 2021

 

The European countries' royals annually reviewed are as follows, with the key developments over the year outlined afterwards:


Existing hereditary monarchies: Great Britain, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Spain, Monaco. 

Former monarchies: Russia, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Albania, Serbia, Montenegro, Austria, Germany, Italy, Portugal, France. 

2021

After 73 years of marriage to Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Prince Philip (Duke of Edinburgh, born a prince of Greece) dies aged 99.

George, son and heir to the claim of Grand Duchess Maria of Russia to the former Russian throne, marries Italian Rebecca Bettarini in St Petersburg, Russia.

Princess Marie, consort of Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein, dies aged 81.